View Full Version : 301 redirect?
Blonde Jon
09-01-2007, 10:04 AM
I have a website that is currently 100% html. It is a pain to edit when I want to add new pages. I am ranking well on all my pages so I don't want to do anything major that will interupt my traffic.
I'm thinking of making my pages all php to make editing easier. Should I do a 301 redirect for all my pages. I probably have about 30 - 40 pages. Or should I do some sort of mod rewrite?
Thanks!
:D
I think a better approach would be set up your server to process your or parse your htm files as php ones. You can do that with htaccess too.
It's quite server intensive though depending on how many visitors you get, but would that suit you?
seopool
12-26-2007, 02:10 AM
Well I can say only one thing:
" Paz have grate SEO knowledge "
I really prefer to work with him, (if I get chance)
dilligaf
12-27-2007, 10:28 AM
I doubt you'll get that chance bumping a thread that's over three months old... but who knows.
seopool
12-27-2007, 08:32 PM
Dear Dilligaf, Thanks for comments;
I impressed with Paz's comment thats why I just represent my thoughts, (Does it matter that, this thread is 3 months old)
dilligaf
01-01-2008, 06:22 AM
[QUOTE=seopool] (Does it matter that, this thread is 3 months old)[/QUOTE]
Yea
seopool
01-01-2008, 08:04 AM
[QUOTE=dilligaf]Yea[/QUOTE]
please explain so that I can remind the ethics in future
dilligaf
01-01-2008, 11:41 AM
It's more style than ethics... old threads being "bumped" is generally perceived as spam unless it was by someone involved in the discussion that may have new information or new questions. Even so, it's best then to start a new thread and reference the old with a link to the discussion.
Typical reasons for bringing up "dead threads" are promotional links, forum sig spam... etc.
seopool
01-01-2008, 08:27 PM
Thanks, I will try to maintain the quality of forum
vBulletin v3.0.3, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.