View Full Version : Time to take from pr 0 to pr 3

chhchung
10-25-2004, 08:42 AM
Anyone can tell me how much time to take from pr 0 to pr 3. I waste a year don't do any SEO at all. I found this site a month ago and that's my first time heard about link and pagerank. I did very good SEO on yahoo and msn. Is that mean my meta tag (description, key word, anchor text) is good enough? I just need to target on link exchange right now. Link exchange sounds easy, but i take alot of time on it. I still waiting the aprove from DMOZ. Anyone know any good directory for gifts, wholesale, related directory. I know b2btoday.com is good, i got one visitor visite my site everyday.

One thing still confuse me is internal link and external link. What the h*** is that? I heard ppl said if put too much inbound link that hurt pr. blah blah blah
mattmdesign
10-25-2004, 10:36 AM
internal links are from your site, to your sites other pages. externals/outbounds are links from your site to other sites.
inbound links are good for pr. they are links from other sites pointing to you.
here is a list of directories to start with:
http://www.strongestlinks.com/directories.php
zekkas
10-25-2004, 08:01 PM
Wich are the most important links?

My site http://www.solodivorcios.cl have Pr 0 please help!!
chhchung
10-26-2004, 02:48 PM
zekkas, google didn't cache your site at all

try search this at google

cache:www.solodivorcios.cl

Also i read your source and find some problem. Below is your source. Actually you don't need meta - googlebot, You can't command google anyway. Just like beg for money on the street. You should let googlebot read the "Title" first by moving <title....> to the top just below <head>.And meta - Description get second. Then The keyword. There are other aspects you need to improve also. I just tell you the most important - Title
Just curious, is it your work or copy from someone else.

<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="robots" content="index,follow">
<META NAME="GOOGLEBOT" CONTENT="INDEX, FOLLOW">
<META NAME="keywords" content="Divorcios, Chile, Estudio Jurídico, Abogados, abogado, abogada, Especialistas, especialista, experto, expertos, Ley de Divorcio, ley, legal, legales, juridicos, juridico, juridica, juridicas, asesoría, Asesoría jurídica, Asesoría legal, demanda, Demandas, demandado, demandada, Juicio, juicios, hijos, Menores Pensión, pension alimenticia, pensiones, visitas, tuicion, tuiciones, Familia, matrimonio, matrimonios, casados, separados, divorciados, anulados, Defensas, defensa, defensor, Nulidades, Separados, Nulidad, Derecho, Derechos, Honorarios, demandante, Info, Santiago, Consultas, Juridicos, Aboagdos, Divorce, lawyers, Chilean, attorneys, law, family, separation, separations, Divorsios, Divorsio, Bufete, Separaciones, Estudio, Santiago, Chile, ">
<META NAME="description" content=" Estudio Jurídico en Santiago de Chile con abogados especialistas en divorcios, separaciones, nulidades, menores y otros temas vinculados al derecho de familia. Chilean Law Firm with divorce and family lawyers.">
<title> Solo Divorcios Chile: Estudio Jurídico con Abogados Especialistas en Ley de Divorcio.</title>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">


<META content="" name=DESCRIPTION>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>
</head>
zekkas
10-27-2004, 11:25 AM
Its my own content but the guy who built the site did probably copy the structure from site with good positioning...

Is it absolut necessary to place the title and description right under head?? I think that I have seen good positioned sites with the titles at the end...

Do you have some other good tip about my site or source?

Should I place different title words in the different sections of my site?? I am aware that some words are the same troghout the hole site...

/Z
chhchung
10-27-2004, 03:01 PM
Doesn't matter you don't believe me. You can try some seo software to optimize your site. They will tell you the same thing. Of course, you got other thing to improve. But i don't tell you that much, you don't believe it anyway