 |
|

07-04-2007, 01:06 AM
|
 |
SEO
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 248
|
|
|
yahoo search results very poor
Anyone know why the yahoo search engine is so poor, or anyone got any idea how it ranks websites?
When using the yahoo.co.uk search, I search for the keywords 'dogs for sale' and it comes back with the number 1 result being a canine food company with a simple page that sells dogs for sale. Whilst it may be selling dogs for sale on that page, that is not the websites main purpose and the website is not very popular anyway. There are hundreds of dedicated pet websites whose main purpose is selling dogs and who have opitmised their site for that and got thousands of relevant backlinks.
I'm not sure if this is the case with other keywords in yahoo, but I would have thought that they should spend more time in improving their search results.
Anyone got any comments??? I think they are years behind google.
|

07-04-2007, 06:28 AM
|
 |
SEO
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 597

|
|
|
though its still up to Yahoo which site that they want rank first... but thats the purpose of seo maybe the site have a proper optimization... and they deserve to rank for first for their effort..
Last edited by kutsarita : 09-06-2007 at 06:58 AM.
|

07-07-2007, 01:50 AM
|
 |
SEO GUY Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Antalya, Turkey
Posts: 4,181

|
|
|
I don't spend a lot of time looking at yahoo serps these days, but they're a long way behind Google in terms of relevance. That's due to a lack of resources for sure.
Yahoo still prefers higher keyword densities, high numbers of incoming links regardless of quality or relevance, and you can rank particulary well in Yahoo if you can get a high PR (PR7 and above) link.
Cheers,
Paz.
__________________
10.3 million entries for Hotels in Turkey but I'm still chipping away.
|

07-07-2007, 08:24 AM
|
 |
SEO
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 248
|
|
|
I shouldnt really bother about yahoo results when i rank well in google but they really are very poor.
If you search in yahoo for 'dogs' and select UK only, the website that is number 1 has only one backlink and is a very poor site. I dont think yahoo uses backlinks that much to determine its serps, I think it mainly factors the keyword in the domain and onpage seo.
|

07-07-2007, 11:19 AM
|
 |
SEO GUY Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Antalya, Turkey
Posts: 4,181

|
|
|
Yeah I've just found the site you were referring to in the UK only results and nearly fell off my chair... looks like they really have some work to do there
__________________
10.3 million entries for Hotels in Turkey but I'm still chipping away.
|

07-13-2007, 05:45 AM
|
|
SEO Junior and a half
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 73
|
|
|
Yahoo has always been easier than google for me. I have been #1 for years. G movers around from 2 to 200. I would start with the basics.
On screen SEO
Change the page title. Start the home page title with your most important keyword phrase. Mine is cheap sunglasses. I also include a visible link as close to the top of the page as I can. Take a look at my site as an example.
Off Screen
Get links. Y is not picky. Any link is a good link. I have 1700+ backlinks on Y and 11 on G
Hope it helps.
|

07-25-2007, 10:23 PM
|
|
SEO
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: at the house
Posts: 147
|
|
|
do some link building.. and having a unique content will give a boost to yahoo ranking..
__________________
|

08-31-2007, 11:25 PM
|
 |
SEO
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 138
|
|
|
If you have submitted your site on high PR links then you find your site in yahoo SERPs.
|

09-06-2007, 03:33 AM
|
 |
SEO
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 1,077

|
|
|
You can't predict results in Yahoo so easily if your content and meta tags are not provided with your targeted keywords and also having with the less age of domain if you are pitching for highly searchable keywords.
It wants more efforts and more time for Yahoo. Even, It seems like Google is much more easy than Yahoo.
|

09-06-2007, 11:12 PM
|
|
SEO Almost
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 109
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mit
It wants more efforts and more time for Yahoo. Even, It seems like Google is much more easy than Yahoo.
|
lol....you are making blind statements  Most webmasters are behind Google
and once they are on it then they try for Yahoo, really i think if you are on Google then it's easy to get for Yahoo too.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|