SEO | Link Popularity | Search Engine Consulting | SEO Tutorial | SEO Tools | SEO Forum
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2004, 07:53 AM
BlkJack's Avatar
BlkJack BlkJack is offline
SEO
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 233 BlkJack will become famous soon enough
What Keyword Density is too high

While reviewing my results I noticed that some of the keyword phrases are not doing as well as others. I used some new tools and found that some of my phrases are repeated quite a few times.


Q. Keyword Phrases - How many times is too much?

Q. Keyword Density - What density is too high?
__________________
Web-Directories.ws A list of 20,000 directory listings

Best-Web-Directories.com submissions Submission service and detailed directory rankings.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2004, 08:13 AM
jocelyn's Avatar
jocelyn jocelyn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Montréal / Canada
Posts: 5,155 jocelyn has a spectacular aura aboutjocelyn has a spectacular aura aboutjocelyn has a spectacular aura about
Read your text and ask yourself. Do I sound senile and like I'm repeting the same thing over and over. After you read it, if you wonder, am I spamming, usually, you are. People talk of 2.5 - 8 % as being acceptable. A bot would see something like this :

xx xxxx keyword xxxx xx xxxx xxx xxxxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxxx keyword xxx xx xxxxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxx xxxx xx keyword xxxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx keyword.

xx keyword xxxx xxxx xx keyword xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxxxx keyword xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx keyword xxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx keyword xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx keyword xxxx xxx xxxx keyword xxxx xxxxxxx keyword xxxx xxxxx xxxxx keyword

Obviously, keyword is omnipresent on the second example, even too present. Ususally just reading your text will tell you if you sound like an old scratched record.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2004, 08:45 AM
BlkJack's Avatar
BlkJack BlkJack is offline
SEO
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 233 BlkJack will become famous soon enough
Thumbs up

I think you are right Jocelyn about the search engines looking for a natural time sentences like:

xx xxxx keyword xxxx xx xxxx xxx xxxxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxxx keyword xxx xx xxxxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxx xxxx xx keyword xxxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx keyword.


I was wondering why some of my sub-pages were doing worse in the rankings than my home page, even though the sub-page is heavily optomized. Many of the sub pages have mostly tables and menus. It also makes sense because the search engines would lessen the impact of reciprocal link directories.

I am going to try adding a paragraph or two to some of my pages.
__________________
Web-Directories.ws A list of 20,000 directory listings

Best-Web-Directories.com submissions Submission service and detailed directory rankings.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-20-2004, 09:25 AM
Cygnus's Avatar
Cygnus Cygnus is offline
SEO GUY Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cave Creek, AZ
Posts: 732 Cygnus will become famous soon enough
Well, don't neglect linking directly to those sub-pages. Keyword density is an important issue to address, but my guess is that the home page gets all your IBLs...mix it up a bit by getting links directly to those sub-pages (if you haven't already).

Cygnus
__________________
Two projects I'm working on: Car Insurance (spidering test) and Auto Insurance
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-20-2004, 10:04 AM
BlkJack's Avatar
BlkJack BlkJack is offline
SEO
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 233 BlkJack will become famous soon enough
Thumbs up

Thanks Cygnus

That was my other question that I actually posted on another board this morning (home page vs sub pages incoming links). I have mixed things up in the past but the one disadvantage came 6 months later when I changed some of the page names.

I will definately take your advice and hope that my memory is better over the next 6 months.

I am starting to see SEO clearly.
__________________
Web-Directories.ws A list of 20,000 directory listings

Best-Web-Directories.com submissions Submission service and detailed directory rankings.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-20-2004, 07:14 PM
eitemiller eitemiller is offline
SEO
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 585 eitemiller is on a distinguished road
Joc said 2.5% - 8% and I wanted to add - that's pretty liberal. Many numbers I have seen are closer to 3%-7%. But IMO, the bottom line is start low, and see what that gets you. Then slowly work your way up.
__________________
Prescott Computer Repair

Last edited by eitemiller : 10-20-2004 at 07:15 PM. Reason: liberal - not liveral
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-20-2004, 07:31 PM
BlkJack's Avatar
BlkJack BlkJack is offline
SEO
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 233 BlkJack will become famous soon enough
When density is discussed, do they mean the density of the visible text?

I noticed that many of the tools available calculate density including non-visible text such as link titles, alt text, page titles...
__________________
Web-Directories.ws A list of 20,000 directory listings

Best-Web-Directories.com submissions Submission service and detailed directory rankings.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2004, 07:40 PM
eitemiller eitemiller is offline
SEO
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 585 eitemiller is on a distinguished road
That's affirmitve. Let's say my keyword was scrub warehouse. And let's let (this is minimized-tiny scale) this here was my index page for that keyword:

text text text text scrub warehouse text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text scrub warehouse text text text text text text text text text text text scrub warehouse text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text scrub warehouse text text text text text text text text text

Now I aint gonna do the math on that. I'm playing some Texas Hold 'em right now. But - if you tried to do two keywords in the same amount of text like:

text text scrub warehouse text text text text text widgets text text text text text text text text text widgets text text text text scrub warehouse text text text text text text text text widgets text text text scrub warehouse text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text scrub warehouse text text text text widgets text text

well, it's gonna be harder. percentages drop. You need content for multiple keywords.
__________________
Prescott Computer Repair
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2004, 02:53 AM
Andy_f Andy_f is offline
SEO Junior
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12 Andy_f is on a distinguished road
look at this forum, a tun of "SEO" on the first page
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-21-2004, 04:53 AM
g00gl3r g00gl3r is offline
SEO
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 148 g00gl3r is on a distinguished road
Yup,

I have always tried to get the keyword at about 3% then extra keywords as bold, italique, different colour and H tags.. just incase it does push it up and get counted.

I am actually just starting on a new underfloor heating site so we can run any tests on it if anybody does want to test this.
__________________
Ta
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Login/Register
User Name
Password
Remember Me?

Forum Links
Forum Home
SEO Forum
Internet Marketing Forum
Web Design Forum
Web Hosting Forum
Programming Forum
SEO Chat

Quick Links
Forum Home
New Posts
Mark Forums Read
Open Buddy List
User Control Panel
Edit Avatar
Edit Profile
Edit Options
Miscellaneous
Subscribed Threads
My Profile

Search Forums

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.